Give the details of the project. What was the scope, timeline, cost. Was the project predictive/ adaptive/ hybrid? Was the decision consciously made?: Project management Assignment, UCD, Ireland

Part 1:- 

• 250 words – Give the details of the project. What was the scope, timeline, cost. Did it go well? If not, why not? If it did, then why so?
• 250 words – Who was involved; what were the team like and how did
  the PM and the team communicate and work with the stakeholders
  (key stakeholders and wider stakeholders).

Part 2:- 

• 250 words – Was the project predictive/ adaptive/ hybrid? Was the
  decision consciously made? Were the options discussed?
• 250 words – What are the benefits/ drawbacks of the approach
  chosen?
• 250 words – Would another approach have been more effective?
  Why?
• 250 words – Describe the differences between the approaches. (Make
  clear to the person marking the assignment that you understand the
  differences between the three approaches.)

Part 3:- 

• 200 words – How was project planning approached? Was there a
  process in place? Who worked on project planning? Could it have
  been done better? Why/ how?
• 200 words – Was there a vision statement done? What was included in
  it? Why was it done? How did it help? If not done, why not? Would it
  have been useful?
• 200 words – Was there a scope management plan done? What was
  included in it? Why was it done? How did it help? If not done, why
  not? Would it have been useful? What about a scope statement and/
  or WBS? (same questions)
• 200 words – Was there a communications management plan done?
  What was included in it? Why was it done? How did it help? If not
  done, why not? Would it have been useful?
• 200 words – Was there a vision statement done? What was included in
  it? Why was it done? How did it help? If not done, why not? Would it
  have been useful?

Part 4:- 

1. 250 words – How was monitoring and controlling approached? Was
   there a process in place? Who managed the monitoring and
   controlling? Could it have been done better? Why/ how?
2. 250 words – How was change managed? Was there a procedure in
   place to control it? Why/ why not? What were the advantages/
   disadvantages of this?
3. 250 words – How was time/ money/ completion of deliverables
   managed? Were there processes in place to control these? Why/ why
   not? What were the advantages/ disadvantages of this?
4. 250 words – How were issues managed? How were they escalated?
   To whom? Why/ why not? What were the advantages/ disadvantages
   of this?