Case Study on Therapeutic Intervention in Social Care: A Practice-Based Analysis
| University | Arden University |
| Subject | Health And Social Care |
Assessment Brief
Part 1 (1.5, 1.15, 2.1, 2.3, 2.17, 3.1, 3.3, 4.4, 5.1, 5.9, 5.10, 5.14, 5.16, 5.19):
Students are required to develop a case study informed by their practice placement experiences. Students must select an individual service user case, then apply and justify a therapeutic approach based on their learning acquired during the module. The analysis should incorporate theory, ethics, supervision, and professional reflective practice, aligning with the Standards of Proficiency for Social Care Workers as outlined by the Social Care Workers Registration Board.
The assignment should cover the following key areas:
1. Organisational Context (Minimum 300 words)
- Describe the setting in which the social care intervention would take place (e.g., residential care, community-based services, family support, mental health services, etc.).
- Identify the target population and the specific needs with reference to relevant research of service users within this context.
- Discuss relevant policies, frameworks, and legislation guiding social care work in this setting.
2. Genogram of the Person Involved (Minimum 250 words, including visual representation)
- Create a genogram to visually represent the service user’s family and social relationships.
- Analyse how familial and social dynamics influence the service user’s experience and therapeutic needs.
3. Therapeutic Intervention Approach (Minimum 700 words)
- Identify the chosen therapeutic intervention (e.g., Trauma-Focused CBT, Narrative Therapy, Play Therapy, Solution-Focused Brief Therapy, etc.). Link the intervention to relevant theories and models of practice.
- Justify the selection of this intervention in relation to the needs of the service user.
- Review recent literature and evidence-based research supporting the use of the chosen therapeutic approach.
- Discuss the efficacy and limitations of the intervention.
- Compare and contrast findings from different sources to support the application of the approach in social care settings.
Are You Searching Answer of this Question? Request Ireland Writers to Write a plagiarism Free Copy for You.
4. Implementation of the Approach: Techniques and Skills (Minimum 400 words)
- Planning: Explain how you would plan the chosen therapeutic approach in practice.
- Implementation: Detail specific techniques and skills required (e.g., active listening, cognitive restructuring, creative expression, motivational interviewing, etc.).
- Evaluation: Discuss how the intervention aligns with evidence-informed practice in social care.
5. Expected Outcomes (Minimum 250 words)
- Outline the short-term and long-term goals of the intervention.
- Describe indicators of positive change and how progress will be assessed.
- Discuss how the intervention contributes to service user empowerment and well-being.
6. Ethical Issues Arising for the Service User and Social Care Worker (Minimum 850 words)
- Identify ethical considerations relevant to the case study (e.g., informed consent, confidentiality, dual relationships, power dynamics, etc.).
- Reflect on these challenges for the social care worker in implementing the intervention.
- Discuss strategies to address these challenges while maintaining professional boundaries and effective engagement.
- Discuss how supervision and continuous learning and development in therapeutic practice will be used in line with professional standards and codes of ethics.
7. Reflections on the Writing Process (Minimum 250 words)
- What aspects of the assignment were most engaging and informative?
- What aspects would you approach differently in the future?
- What challenges did you encounter in writing this assignment?
- How has the assignment influenced your understanding of therapeutic interventions in social care?
Written Assignment
The Requirements for written assignment are as follows:
- 12 Font (Times New Roman).
- Line spacing 1.5.
- Make sure page numbers are included throughout.
- It is essential that this assignment follows Harvard UL Referencing. Please refer to the Harvard Referencing Guidelines found here.
- Ensure that you follow the appropriate academic tone. Avoid the use of personal pronouns. A guide to academic writing can be found here.
- Your assignment should be underpinned by good quality, relevant and current literature.
Get Solution of this Assessment. Hire Experts to solve this assignment for you Before Deadline.
Grading Rubric for Assignment 1 (80%)
| Criteria | Excellent (85%–100%) | Very Good (70%–84%) | Good (55%–69%) | Satisfactory (40%–54%) | Fail (0%–39%) | Marks Available | Marks Given | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Organisational Context | Demonstrates exceptional understanding of the setting, target population, and relevant policies/frameworks. In-depth research and critical engagement. | Provides strong analysis of the setting, population, and policies with good depth and structure. | Adequate discussion but lacks depth or specific details. Some missing references. | Limited engagement with the setting and policies. Lacks clarity or detail. | Vague or inaccurate description with minimal or no references. | 10 | ||
| Genogram and Analysis | Detailed and accurate genogram with deep analysis of familial and social dynamics influencing the service user. | Well-developed genogram and good analysis of family/social factors. | Adequate genogram with some analysis, but lacking depth. | Genogram included but with limited or unclear analysis. | Genogram missing or insufficient analysis provided. | 10 | ||
| Therapeutic Intervention Approach | Clearly identifies and justifies the selected approach with exceptional theoretical and research integration. Strong comparisons of different models. | Very good justification and integration of theory and research. Some comparisons. | Adequate justification with some theoretical support but lacking in-depth research. | Limited justification with minimal theoretical or research support. | No justification or theoretical basis provided. | 15 | ||
| Implementation of the Approach | Exceptionally well-structured plan, with detailed techniques and evaluation measures based on best practices. | Clear and structured implementation plan with appropriate techniques and skills. | Adequate planning with some techniques and evaluation but lacking depth. | Limited planning and unclear application of techniques. | No clear plan or application of intervention techniques. | 10 | ||
| Expected Outcomes | Clearly defined, realistic goals with well-structured indicators for measuring progress and empowerment. | Good outline of goals and expected outcomes with some measurable indicators. | Adequate discussion of outcomes, but lacks measurable indicators. | Limited discussion of outcomes, vague or unrealistic goals. | No clear outcomes or goals provided. | 10 | ||
| Ethical Issues | Comprehensive identification and discussion of ethical considerations. Clear strategies to address issues and maintain professional boundaries. | Well-developed discussion of ethical issues with good practical strategies. | Adequate discussion but lacks depth or application of ethical considerations. | Limited discussion with minimal engagement in ethical considerations. | No discussion of ethical issues or fails to address them adequately. | 15 | ||
| Supervision and Reflection | Exceptional insight into the role of supervision and continuous learning in professional development. | Strong discussion on supervision and learning but with minor gaps. | Adequate reflection on supervision but lacks depth. | Limited engagement with supervision, lacks clarity. | No discussion of supervision or learning reflection. | 5 | ||
| Reflections on Writing Process | Deep and insightful reflection on engagement, challenges, and learning. Identifies areas for improvement and future learning. | Good reflection with strong engagement, but minor gaps in depth. | Adequate reflection but lacks deep personal insight or future learning considerations. | Limited reflection with vague engagement in the assignment process. | No reflection or minimal response. | 5 | ||
| Total | 80 | |||||||
Grade Descriptors:
- A (85%–100%): Excellent (17–20 marks): Exceptional depth of reflection, insightful analysis, strong theoretical connections, and clear application of social care frameworks. Demonstrates excellent self-awareness, critical thinking, and professional growth.
- B (70%–84%): Very Good (14–16 marks): Thoughtful and well-developed work with strong links to practice and theory. Demonstrates a high level of engagement and structured reflection.
- C (55%–69%): Good (11–13 marks): Adequate application of social care theory and reflection. Some insights and self-awareness demonstrated, though lacking depth or originality.
- D (40%–54%): Satisfactory (8–10 marks): Limited reflection with superficial analysis. Minimal integration of theory or professional practice. Lacks depth and structure.
- F (0%–39%): Fail (0–7 marks): Poorly developed reflections with little depth, unclear writing, and minimal engagement with the assignment criteria. Fails to demonstrate understanding of key concepts or lacks required components.
Stuck in Completing this Assignment and feeling stressed ? Take our Private Writing Services
Get Help By Expert
Stressed about your HSC Case Study Analysis - Therapeutic Intervention in Social Care Assignment? Calm down! Zero-AI Ireland Assignment Help will provide you with expert writers who can write your assignment with no plagiarism and 100% original content. Explore our free sample assignments where you check the quality of our work. Just write Do My Assignment, and we ensure that your assignment will be completed and help you stand out from the rest with better grades.
